Photovoltaic Device

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a tandem PV cell group ( 1 ) having two PV cells ( 11, 21 ) of different cell types. A separate power electronic unit ( 31, 32 ) is assigned to each of the PV cells in such a manner that a voltage generated in the particular PV cell or the corresponding power yield can be supplied to the assigned power electronic unit. The power electronic units can be operated independently of one another with the aid of a control device ( 40 ) in such a manner that each PV subsystem having one of the PV cells in each case and the power electronic unit assigned to the particular PV cell operates at the optimum operating point thereof. For this purpose, the control device can operate in such a manner that, during operation of the power electronic unit of each PV subsystem, a product of the power yield and the cell voltage of the PV cell assigned to the particular power electronic unit is at a maximum.

This application is the National Stage of International Application No.PCT/EP2018/055499, filed Mar. 6, 2018, which claims the benefit ofGerman Patent Application No. 10 2017 203 809.8, filed Mar. 8, 2017, andGerman Patent Application No. 10 2017 205 524.3, filed Mar. 31, 2017.The entire contents of these documents are hereby incorporated herein byreference.

BACKGROUND

The present embodiments relate to a photovoltaic device having two ormore separate solar cells.

Solar power generation using photovoltaic (PV) devices is contributing,for environmental and increasingly also economic reasons (e.g., inCentral Europe), to electricity production to a rapidly increasingextent. However, this regenerative energy source, also and in particularin comparison with conventional energy sources, has to be competitive.For this reason, it is sought to drive PV power generation costs belowthose of conventional (e.g., fossil energy generation) even in regionswith moderately intensive solar irradiation (e.g., Germany).

The costs of a PV facility are determined for the most part by systemcosts (e.g., for the overall panel, the wiring, the power electronicsand other structural costs). Even though what are known as perovskitematerials such as, for example, CH3NH3PbI3 (or more generally(CH3NH3)MX3-xYx (where M=Pb or Sn and X, Y=I, Br or Cl)), which permit ahigh-efficiency conversion of electromagnetic radiation energy intoelectrical energy due to their optoelectronic properties, have gained insignificance in recent years and promise an effect that lowers operatingcosts, using such new, inexpensive solar cells on their own is not yetsufficient. By contrast, the efficiency of the solar cells is to befurther increased.

One approach for increasing efficiency is that of using tandem PV cellgroups in which two or even more light-sensitive PV cells or layers arearranged above one another. The various cells in this case differideally in terms of spectral sensitivity (e.g., different cells haverespective maximum efficiency for different spectral ranges ofsunlight). This has the effect that the tandem cell group as a wholeoffers high efficiency for a broader spectral range.

Such a tandem cell group may have, for example, a conventionalsilicon-based PV cell to which a further PV cell (e.g.,perovskite-based) is applied. Perovskite materials have a greaterbandgap than silicon-based materials. Due to this, the perovskite-basedPV cell has a higher absorption component in the blue or short-wavespectral range and lets through light of a longer wavelength. Thesilicon-based PV cell absorbs to a greater extent in thelonger-wavelength spectral range, such that the light let through by theperovskite cell or layer or at least part thereof is absorbed by thesilicon cell.

FIG. 1 shows a side view of such a known tandem PV cell group 1. Theupper cell 11 (e.g., facing the light source or the sun, notillustrated) of the tandem cell group 1 is a PV cell made from a firstmaterial having maximum efficiency in a first spectral range S1. Thelower cell 21 is a PV cell made from a second material having maximumefficiency in a second spectral range S2. The spectral ranges S1, S2 andalso the materials are different. Such tandem cell groups operate inprinciple in accordance with the concept that the electric current Igenerated under light incidence L flows successively through both cells11, 21 (e.g., the cells 11, 21 are electrically connected in series). Inthis case, however, the problem occurs that in the event that currentsof a significantly different value are generated in the two cells 11,21, that cell 11, 21 in which a low current is generated is flowedthrough by the large current of the other cell 21, 11, which may lead todamage. Both cells 11, 21 ideally deliver the same current perlight-sensitive surface area. Due to the differing nature of thematerials used in the various cells 11, 21, this is, however, generallynot the case. This has the effect that the efficiency of the tandem PVcell group 1 is considerably lower on the whole than theoreticallypossible or would be expected based on the individual efficiencies.

This problem is able in principle to be solved using an approach knownas “current matching,” in that the individual cells 11, 21 areconfigured to deliver electric currents of the same value. To achievethis, the light-sensitive areas 12, 22, which generate the current underappropriate illumination, of the two PV cells 11, 21 may be matched toone another. The areas 12 in the first cell 11 consist of the firstmaterial, and the areas 22 in the second cell 21 consist of the secondmaterial. It is assumed in this case that the electric current producedin one area 12, 22 is proportional to the surface area of the respectivearea 12, 22. The surface areas as well as the numbers of areas 12, 22,as indicated in FIG. 2, may accordingly be selected so as to bedifferent, such that the two cells 11, 21 ultimately deliver electriccurrents of the same value. The variables and numbers to be selected forthis purpose for the surface areas in this case depend on the respectivematerials. The differently formed structures lying above one another inthis connection, however, turn out to be technologically problematic.

FIG. 2 shows a view in the y-direction onto the planes indicated by thedashed lines in FIG. 1, where the illustration in FIG. 2 is selected asthough the cell 1 of FIG. 1 were to be unfolded such that the two layers11, 21 now lie next to one another. It is explained that the surfaceareas of the areas 12 of the first cell 11 are greater than the surfaceareas of the areas 22 of the second cell 21. In this case, for the sakeof clarity, only a few of the respective areas 12, 22 are provided withreference signs. For each PV cell 11, 21, it is the case that the areas12, 22 of the respective cell 11, 21 are connected in series to form arespective area group 13, 23. The two area groups 13, 23 are alsoconnected electrically in a row (e.g., in series).

Although the concept of matching the surface areas of thelight-sensitive areas 12, 22 does theoretically provide a solution tothe problem, it turns out in practice that the efficiency of the tandemPV cell group 1 constructed in this way continues to remain on averagebelow the theoretically possible value. This is linked to the fact thatthe light intensities are in practice not constant over time, but ratherare subject to more or less strong deviations throughout the day. Thishas an effect of differing magnitude on the voltages or currentsgenerated by the various cells. Silicon-based PV cells (Si cells) thusoperate at particularly high efficiency at high light intensities (e.g.,at full sunlight). The efficiency of such Si cells however drops belowthe efficiency of, for example, organic PV cells under weaker light.These organic PV cells have comparatively good efficiencies, forexample, under diffuse and weak light. It is to be assumed that thedifferent cells are subject to different aging effects and temperatureresponses. The approach illustrated in FIG. 2 having matched surfaceareas of the light-sensitive areas is thus ultimately not expedient.

SUMMARY AND DESCRIPTION

The scope of the present invention is defined solely by the appendedclaims and is not affected to any degree by the statements within thissummary.

The present embodiments may obviate one or more of the drawbacks orlimitations in the related art. For example, an alternative approach fora high-efficiency photovoltaic cell is provided.

A PV device according to an embodiment has a multi-PV cell group havingat least one first PV cell of a first cell type and one second PV cellof a second cell type, where the first cell type and the second celltype differ from one another. Each of the PV cells provides an electriccell voltage U1, U2 under light incidence on the respective PV cell.Also provided are power electronics having a separate first powerelectronics unit that is assigned to the first PV cell and a separatesecond power electronics unit that is assigned to the second PV cell.The electric cell voltage U1, U2 generated in the respective PV cell anda corresponding current yield I1, I2 are able to be fed to the separatepower electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell (e.g., viaappropriate electrical connections). The PV device also has a controldevice for controlling the power electronics. The first powerelectronics unit and the second power electronics unit are then able tobe operated independently of one another via the control device suchthat each PV subsystem, each of which has one of the PV cells and thepower electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell, operates at arespective optimum operating point. In other words, the PV device has atleast one first PV subsystem and one second PV subsystem, where thefirst PV subsystem has the first PV cell and the first power electronicsunit, and the second PV subsystem has the second PV cell and the secondpower electronics unit.

For the design of the high-efficiency multi-PV cell group provided herethat does not lose its high efficiency even under variable lightingintensity, it is possible to dispense with the “current matching”approach described above. The tandem PV cell group has two galvanicallyisolated PV cells that are not directly electrically connected in seriesor in any other way. Rather, the electric voltages generated by the PVcells of the cell group under illumination and as a result also thecorresponding currents are each fed to a separate power electronicsunit. By using individual power electronics units for the various PVcells, a situation is achieved whereby each PV cell is able to beoperated at the optimum operating point.

The control device is configured, during the operation of the powerelectronics unit of each PV subsystem, to control the respective powerelectronics unit such that a product of the current yield I1, I2 and thecell voltage U1, U2 of the PV cell assigned to the respective powerelectronics unit is at a maximum. It is assumed here and hereinafterthat the expression that the product should be “at a maximum” does notnecessarily mean or may not necessarily mean at all times the exactpoint at which the product reaches the absolute maximum. This is alsonot technically able to be implemented insofar as the values fed to thecontrol device continuously vary in practice within a certain range,such that a theoretically actual maximum value at a time T1 is alreadyno longer the theoretically maximum value at the next time T2. Theexpression that the respective product should be “at a maximum”accordingly provides that, in the context of the control, control isperformed in each case such that the power electronics units are eachconstantly adjusted such that the respective current-voltage productchanges with respect to the instantaneous theoretically possiblemaximum. Control is thus performed such that the current-voltageproduct, considered over a particular time period, does not becomesmaller. In other words, the product may become greater or may remainconstant in the event that the theoretically possible maximum hasalready been reached.

The control device may for this purpose operate such that, during thecontrolling of the respective power electronics unit, an inputresistance of the respective power electronics unit is able to beadjusted such that the product of the current yield I1, I2 and the cellvoltage U1, U2 of the PV cell assigned to the respective powerelectronics unit is at a maximum. The control device is, for example,configured to control the power electronics units independently of oneanother. The control device may have, for example, a number ofcontrollers corresponding to the number of PV subsystems. Thesecontrollers may be configured, for example, as PID controllers.

As an alternative or in addition, the PV device has a sensor devicehaving a device (e.g., a sensor) for determining temperatures of the PVcells and/or for determining an ambient temperature of the multi-PV cellgroup. One or more parameters describing the temperatures and/or theambient temperature are fed to the control device as an input variable(e.g., a first input variable and/or a second input variable). Inaddition or as an alternative, the sensor device may have a device(e.g., a sensor) for determining a light intensity incident on the PVdevice (e.g., on the first PV cell). A parameter describing the lightintensity is fed to the control device as an input variable (e.g., athird input variable). Likewise, in addition or as an alternative, thesensor device may have a device for determining a spectrum of a lightincident on the PV device (e.g., on the first PV cell). A parameterdescribing the spectrum is fed to the control device as an inputvariable (e.g., a fourth input variable). The control device is thendesigned to control the power electronics units based on the first inputvariable, the second input variable, the third input variable, thefourth input variable, or any combination thereof fed thereto.

The control device is, for example, configured in this case to performthe control (e.g., based on lookup tables or in a model-based manner),such that, depending on the input variable or input variables for eachpower electronics unit, input resistance is determined and set such thatthe product of the current yield I and the cell voltage U of the PV cellassigned to the respective power electronics unit is at a maximum.

The first cell type and the second cell type may be selected such thatpower conversation efficiency (PCE) maximas lie in different spectralranges, respectively.

For the second PV cell, a cell type is, for example, having a PCEmaximum that lies in a spectral range to which the first PV cell issubstantially transparent is selected. “Substantially transparent” maybe that the first PV cell absorbs this specific spectral range to a muchsmaller extent in comparison with other spectral ranges. The first PVcell in principle has a specific degree of absorption in each spectralrange relevant for this application. It may likewise be assumed that thedegree of absorption in some ranges of the light spectrum iscomparatively low and thus “substantially transparent.”

By way of example, the first PV cell may be a perovskite-based PV cell,and/or the second PV cell may be a silicon-based PV cell.

In this case, the control device is designed to control the powerelectronics unit assigned to the first perovskite-based PV cell suchthat hysteresis of output variables of the first PV cell is compensated.This compensation is achieved by correspondingly adjusting the operatingparameters of the controller (e.g., PID parameters).

The control device is also configured to execute the control of thepower electronics units such that aging of a respective PV cell and/orsoiling of the multi-PV cell group or of the individual PV cells iscompensated. In this case, it is again sought to optimize the product ofthe current yield I and the cell voltage U of the PV cell assigned tothe respective power electronics unit, where the input resistances ofthe power electronics units are also set independently of one anotherhere.

In a method according to one or more of the present embodiments foroperating such a PV device having a multi-PV cell group, powerelectronics, and a control device of the types mentioned at the outset,the first and the second power electronics unit are operatedindependently of one another by the control device, such that each PVsubsystem, each of which has one of the PV cells and the powerelectronics unit assigned thereto, operates at a respective optimumoperating point.

During the operation of the power electronics unit of each PV subsystem,the respective power electronics unit is controlled such that a productof the current yield I1, I2 and the cell voltage U1, U2 of the PV cellassigned to the respective power electronics unit is at a maximum.

During the control of the respective power electronics unit, an inputresistance of the respective power electronics unit is adjusted suchthat the product of the current yield I1, I2 and the cell voltage U1, U2of the PV cell assigned to the respective power electronics unit is at amaximum.

The control device may control the power electronics units independentlyof one another.

Again in the event that the PV device has a sensor device of theabovementioned type, the power electronics units are controlled based onthe input variable or input variables fed to the control device.

In this case, the control is executed (e.g., based on lookup tables orin a model-based manner), such that, depending on the input variable orinput variables for each power electronics unit, input resistance isdetermined and set with which the product of the current yield I and thecell voltage U of the PV cell assigned to the respective powerelectronics unit is at a maximum. In this case, an aging curve of a cellsituation may also be stored in the lookup table.

For each of the power electronics, the voltage and current levels arethus adjusted such that a maximum energy yield of the respective PV cellis achieved (e.g., each PV cell operates with the power electronicsassigned thereto at a respective optimum operating point).

The adjustment may be performed, for example, by controlling the inputresistance of the respective power electronics, where controlling theinput resistance has an effect on the current yield I in the case of acell voltage U, dependent on the illumination, of the PV cell connectedto these power electronics. The product of the voltage U generated bythe PV cell under illumination and the corresponding current I describesthe energy yield of the PV cell.

By virtue of the individual adjustment, which is possible via theseparate power electronics units, this is able to be performed withconsiderably lower losses in comparison with the situation withelectrically fixedly coupled PV cells, in which one cell type is alwaysoperated in a suboptimal manner in practice. The concept is thus basedon moving away from previously ubiquitous paradigms of the conventionalseries connection of individual cells of a multi-PV cell group havingcommon electronics toward the parallelized concept of the individual PVcells, in which separate primary electronics are used to operate both PVcells under optimal conditions and the useful energies are able to beadded at the level of the electronics.

By this approach, the explained disadvantages of the variouscurrent-carrying capabilities of different PV cells are eliminated. Atthe same time, each PV cell of the cell group is able to be operated ata corresponding optimum operating point (e.g., by virtue of the factthat separate power electronics are provided for both PV cells, theseparate power electronics are both able to be operated continuously atthe respective optimum operating point).

The approach that is presented additionally solves another problematicaspect of multi-PV cell groups: PV cells are generally subject to anaging process. In the conventional series connection of the cells of thecell group in accordance with the prior art, this inevitably results indetuning of the matching of the individual cells. This effect no longerplays a role in the approach according to the present embodiments.

In addition, dispensing with “current matching” results in expansivedesign freedoms for the individual cells. Thus, for example, the surfaceareas of both PV cells of the cell group may be selected as far aspossible freely (e.g., a cell surface area may in each case be used thatoptimally suits the respective technology). PV cells above one anotherof the same size may likewise be used. This may be advantageous whenusing thin-film systems for the individual PV cells, in which layerboundaries and the corresponding stage often constitute technologicalhurdles for layers deposited thereon.

By virtue of the above-described division of the cell group intoindividual cells and, for example, the use of separate, independentpower electronics, it is possible to use electronics optimized to therespective PV cell. According to one or more of the present embodiments,due to the separate electronics, it is possible, in addition toadjusting to the respective optimum operating point, to address yetfurther problematic topics that occur specifically in newperovskite-based PV cells. By way of example, a perovskite-based cellexhibits hysteresis of the output characteristic variables of the cell(e.g., the output characteristics of the cell change depending on theprevious operation of the cell). This is able to be compensated, forexample, by adjusting the PID parameters of a PID controller integratedin the power electronics of the perovskite-based PV cell.

Perovskite-based PV cells, in contrast to conventional PV cells, oftenexhibit an inflow effect, which involves the maximum efficiency of thecell, often referred to as “power conversion efficiency” (PCE), beingachieved, under constant illumination, only after a certain delay timeafter the cell is put into service. In contrast to the perovskite-basedcell, the PCE of a silicon-based PV cell is achieved virtuallyimmediately after putting into service. Again due to the separate powerelectronics units and the individual control of the different PVsubsystems, both subsystems are able to be operated at the optimumoperating point. Although the energy yield of the perovskite-based cellis reduced in comparison with the yield of the other cells during theeffects of the inflow effect, it is nevertheless optimum for theexisting conditions due to the option of individual control.

The concept is able to be applied not only in the case of thecombination of perovskite-based and silicon-based cells, but inprinciple to any desired combinations with other PV cell types, such as,for example, thin-film solar cells or with III/V semiconductor cells.

Further advantages and embodiments become apparent from the drawings andthe corresponding description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The same components in different figures are identified using the samereference signs.

In the figures:

FIG. 1 shows a tandem PV cell group according to the prior art;

FIG. 2 shows cross sections of the tandem PV cell group according to theprior art;

FIG. 3 shows a PV device according to an embodiment;

FIG. 4 shows a relationship between current yield I and cell voltage Uin the case of a typical PV cell;

FIG. 5 shows a PV device according to a first variant; and

FIG. 6 shows a PV device according to a second variant.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The same reference signs in different figures identify the samecomponents.

FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of a photovoltaic (PV) device 100 having amulti-PV cell group 1 that has a first PV cell 11 of a first cell type(e.g., having one or more first light-sensitive areas 12 made from afirst material that provide an electric voltage U1 under illumination)and a second PV cell 21 of a second cell type (e.g., having one or moresecond (not illustrated) light-sensitive areas 22 made from a secondmaterial that likewise provide an electric voltage U2 underillumination). The multi-PV cell group 1 having two PV cells 11, 21 isaccordingly a tandem PV cell group. For the sake of simplicity, theexpression is generally used below that the respective PV cell generatesa voltage or the like; this, however, provides that these voltages aregenerated by the respective light-sensitive areas of the cells.

The cell group 1 is arranged during operation such that the first PVcell 11 faces a light source (e.g., the sun). The light L emitted by thelight source and incident on the cell group 1 thus impinges first of allon the first PV cell 11, which, as is known, leads to the first PV cell11 or light-sensitive areas 12 of the first PV cell 11 made from thefirst material generating the first electric cell voltage U1. Afterpassing through the first PV cell 11, the corresponding remaining lightimpinges on the second PV cell 21, which likewise, as is known, leads tothe second PV cell 21 or light-sensitive areas 22 of the second PV cell21 made from the second material generating a second electric cellvoltage U2.

Both the first cell type and the second cell type are selected such thatthe maximum efficiency of the various cells 11, 21, which is alsoreferred to as “power conversion efficiency” (PCE), lie in differentspectral ranges. For example, for the second PV cell 21, a cell typehaving a PCE maximum that lies in a spectral range to which the first PVcell 11 is substantially transparent is selected. “Substantiallytransparent” may be that the first PV cell 11 absorbs this specificspectral range to a much smaller extent in comparison with otherspectral ranges. The first PV cell 11 in principle has a specific degreeof absorption in each spectral range relevant for this application; itmay likewise be assumed that the degree of absorption in some ranges ofthe light spectrum is comparatively low, and the cell 11 is thus“substantially transparent” to this spectral range.

In the example that is shown, the first PV cell 11 is a perovskite-basedPV cell (e.g., the light-sensitive areas 12 of the first PV cell 11 havea perovskite material). The second PV cell 21 is a silicon-based PVcell. Perovskite materials have a greater bandgap than silicon-basedmaterials. Due to this, the perovskite-based PV cell 11 has a higherabsorption component in the blue or short-wave spectral range and letsthrough light of a longer wavelength. The silicon-based PV cell 21absorbs to a greater extent in the longer-wavelength spectral range,such that the light let through by the perovskite cell 11 or at leastpart thereof is able to be absorbed by the silicon cell 21.

The PV device 100 has power electronics 30 having a first powerelectronics unit 31 and a second power electronics unit 32 (e.g., powerelectronics units 31, 32), where the power electronics units 31, 32operate separately and independently of one another. The first powerelectronics unit 31 is assigned to the first PV cell 11, and the secondpower electronics unit 32 is assigned to the second PV cell 21. Thefirst PV cell 11 and the first power electronics unit 31 form, forexample, a first PV subsystem 10 of the cell group 1. Likewise, thesecond PV cell 21 and the second power electronics unit 32 form, forexample, a second PV subsystem 20 of the cell group 1. The cell voltagesU1, U2 generated by the PV cells 11, 21 under illumination are fed tothe respective power electronics unit 31, 32 via appropriate electricalconnections 14, 24. Corresponding current yields I1, I2 result dependingon a respective input resistance of the power electronics units 31, 32.

The PV device 1 also has a control device 40 that is configured, duringoperation of the power electronics unit 31, 32 of each PV subsystem 10,20, to control the respective power electronics unit 31, 32 such that aproduct of the current yield I1 or I2 and the cell voltage U1 or U2 ofthe PV cell 11, 21 assigned to the respective power electronics unit 31,32 is at a maximum. This leads to the energy yield of the respective PVsubsystem 10, 20 reaching a maximum. The optimum operating point isreached individually and independently of one another for the PVsubsystems 10, 20.

In this context and to explain the operation of the control device 40,FIG. 4 shows the relationship between current yield I and cell voltage Uunder constant illumination for a typical PV cell. The optimum operatingpoint with maximum energy yield or optimum energy generation lies at thepoint identified by MAX in the graph. At this point, the product of cellvoltage U and current yield I reaches a maximum. In variable usageconditions (e.g., under changing lighting conditions), due to thediffering nature of the PV cells 11, 21 of the cell group 1, whichtypically respond differently to changes in light intensity andtemperature, etc., situations inevitably arise in which at least one ofthe PV cells 11, 21 is no longer operated at the optimum operatingpoint. This provides, for the entire cell group 1, that the cell group 1is not able to be used at the optimum operating point as a whole. It isonly possible to operate the cell group 1 at the optimum operating pointwhen the individual PV cells 11, 21 forming the cell group 1 or the PVsubsystems 10, 20 are each operated on their own at the optimumoperating point. To achieve this, use is made of the separate powerelectronics 31, 32, since using the separate power electronics 31, 32individually and independently makes it possible to individuallyoptimize the operating parameters for each PV cell 11, 21 or for each PVsubsystem 10, 20.

The control device 40 is then configured, during the controlling of therespective power electronics unit 31, 32, to adjust an input resistanceof the respective power electronics unit 31, 32 and thus the currentyield I in the respective PV subsystem 10, 20, such that the product ofthe current yield I1 or I2 and the cell voltage U1 or U2 is at a maximumfor the PV cell 11, 21 assigned to the respective power electronics unit31, 32. The control device 40 controls the power electronics units 31,32, for example, independently of one another. For this purpose, thecontrol device 40 may have, for example, a number of controllers 41, 42corresponding to the number of PV subsystems 10, 20, where each powerelectronics unit 31, 32 or each PV subsystem 10, 20 is assigned acontroller 41, 42. These controllers 41, 42 may be configured, forexample, as PID controllers.

The control device 40 or the individual controllers 41, 42 operate, forexample, such that, for each PV subsystem 10, 20, a current yield I1 orI2 for the respective PV subsystem 10, 20 and the cell voltage U1 or U2are measured separately. Specifically, for example, the first controller41 may vary the input resistance of the first power electronics unit 31based on the values of I1 and U1 that are fed to the first controller,and in the process, monitor the current yield I1 and the cell voltage U1or the product of these measured values. The input resistance is thenset such that, as already mentioned, the product of current yield I1 andcell voltage U1 reaches a maximum, accompanied by maximum energy yieldof the first PV subsystem 10. The controller 42 of the second PVsubsystem 42 operates in the same way by varying the input resistance ofthe second power electronics unit 32, such that the product of currentyield I2 and cell voltage U2 of the second PV subsystem 20 also reachesa maximum, accompanied by maximum energy yield of the second PVsubsystem 20. By way of the electrical connections 43, 44, indicated bydouble-headed arrows, between power electronics units 31, 32 andcontrollers 41, 42, the components 31, 41 or 32, 42 that are connectedto one another thus interact with one another such that the controllers41, 42 are provided with current and voltage values I1, I2, U1, U2. Thecontrollers 41, 42 influence the power electronics units 31, 32 based onthese values in that the controllers 41, 42 control input resistances ofthe power electronics units 31, 32.

In addition or as an alternative to the procedure explained above basedon current and voltage measurements, the control device 40 may be feddata from a sensor device 50. The sensor device 50 has a device 51(e.g., a sensor) for determining temperatures of the PV cells 11, 21and/or for determining an ambient temperature of the tandem PV cellgroup 1. One or possibly more parameters describing the temperaturesand/or the ambient temperature are fed to the control device 40 and tothe separate controllers 41, 42 as input variables (e.g., a first inputvariable and/or a second input variable). As an alternative or inaddition, the sensor device 50 may have a device 52 (e.g., a sensor) fordetermining a light intensity incident on the multi-PV cell group 1 and,in particular, on the first PV cell 11. A parameter describing the lightintensity is fed to the control device 40 or the controllers 41, 42 asan input variable (e.g., a third input variable). The sensor device 50may also have a device 53 for determining a spectrum of a light incidenton the multi-PV cell group 1 and, in particular, on the first PV cell11. A parameter describing the spectrum is fed to the control device 40or the controllers 41, 42 as an input variable (e.g., a fourth inputvariable). The control device 40 is then configured, based on the inputvariable or input variables fed thereto, to control the powerelectronics units 31, 32 such that the product of the current yield Iand the cell voltage U of the PV cell 11, 21 assigned to the respectivepower electronics unit 31, 32 is at a maximum. This may again beperformed by correspondingly adjusting the input resistance of therespective power electronics unit 31, 32. The target values to which theinput resistances are set in this case may be determined (e.g., in amodel-based manner or based on lookup tables), such that, depending onthe input variable or input variables (e.g., the first variable, thesecond variable, the third variable, the fourth variable, or anycombination thereof) for each power electronics unit 31, 32, inputresistance is determined and set from a corresponding lookup table sothat the product of the current yield I and the cell voltage U of the PVcell 11, 21 assigned to the respective power electronics unit 31, 32 isat a maximum.

The control device 40 may also be used to observe and possibly take intoconsideration an aging process of the cells 11, 21. If the effectivenessof finding the optimum operating point is monitored in both powerelectronics units 31, 32, a warning about degradation of one of thecells may be output or the aging state may be monitored.

It is generally the case that soiling of solar cells (e.g., in ariddesert regions) occurs due to the deposition of dust, often increasedeven further by aerosols containing salt. In humid and natural regions,soiling occurs due to the buildup of cells (e.g., green cells), and inindustrial regions due to the deposition of particles (e.g., soot).Depositions of dust and green cells have a clearly discernible color andthus change the spectral composition of the light that reaches theactual PV cells. In the case of depositions of soot that are seeminglycolorless at first glance (e.g., are substantially black), it becomesclear upon further inspection that the soot particles that appear darkalso have a spectrally dependent light absorption. In the event of amechanical change in the surface (e.g., generation of a matte surfacedue to sand particles), the light is by contrast scattered, and there isnot primarily a spectral shift. In the event of the change resultingfrom soiling in the spectral composition of the light, there isinevitably detuning of the current generation of the two spectrallydifferent PV individual cells 11, 21 of the tandem cell 1. The onlyoption for being able to operate both cells 11, 21 optimally in a stablemanner as before despite soiling is to drive both cells separately or toindependently individually control both PV subsystems 10, 20 inaccordance with the approach described above. In this, the respectivepower electronics unit 31, 32 for each subsystem 10, 20 is controlledsuch that the product of the current yield I and the cell voltage U ofthe PV cell 11, 21 assigned to the respective power electronics unit 31,32 is at a maximum. In this application as well, in which it is possibleto compensate soiling and in the same way any aging of the PV cells 11,21, the control is based on setting the input resistance of a respectivepower electronics unit 31, 32 such that the product reaches a maximum.

The approach proposed here is thus suitable for compensating diversesituations or environmental conditions, where the PV subsystems 10, 20or the power electronics units 31, 32 are controlled independently ofone another.

FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of the PV device 100 in which the wiringcomplexity between the cell group 1 and the power electronics 40 isreduced. For this purpose, the cells 11, 21 are set to a commonpotential or connected to one another such that only three electricallines are to be routed to the power electronics 40.

The embodiment shown in FIG. 6 has the effect that the overall occurringvoltages of the individual cells 11, 21 and thus the requirements interms of insulating the wiring are able to be minimized. For thispurpose, both cells 11, 21 are arranged such that voltages U1, U2 of thecells 11, 21 oppose one another. This is not expedient in the case ofconventional tandem PV cell groups, but may advantageously be applied.It is also optionally expedient, as in the embodiment illustrated inFIG. 5, to place the mutually opposing terminals of the cells 11, 21 ata common potential.

The elements and features recited in the appended claims may be combinedin different ways to produce new claims that likewise fall within thescope of the present invention. Thus, whereas the dependent claimsappended below depend from only a single independent or dependent claim,it is to be understood that these dependent claims may, alternatively,be made to depend in the alternative from any preceding or followingclaim, whether independent or dependent. Such new combinations are to beunderstood as forming a part of the present specification.

While the present invention has been described above by reference tovarious embodiments, it should be understood that many changes andmodifications can be made to the described embodiments. It is thereforeintended that the foregoing description be regarded as illustrativerather than limiting, and that it be understood that all equivalentsand/or combinations of embodiments are intended to be included in thisdescription.

1. A photovoltaic (PV) device comprising: a multi-PV cell group including at least one first PV cell of a first cell type and one second PV cell of a second cell type, wherein the first cell type and the second cell type differ from one another, and wherein each PV cell of the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell is configured to provide an electric cell voltage under light incidence on the respective PV cell; power electronics including a separate first power electronics unit that is assigned to the one first PV cell and a separate second power electronics unit that is assigned to the one second PV cell, wherein the electric cell voltage generated in the respective PV cell and a corresponding current yield are feedable to a separate power electronics unit of the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell; and a controller configured to control the power electronics, wherein the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit are operable independently of one another via the controller, such that each PV subsystem, each of which includes the one first PV cell or the one second PV cell and the power electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell, operates at a respective optimum operating point.
 2. The PV device of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to control, during operation of the the respective separate power electronics unit, such that a product of the current yield and the cell voltage of the respective PV cell assigned to the respective separate power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 3. The PV device of claim 2, wherein the controller is further configured to adjust, during the control of the respective separate power electronics unit, an input resistance of the respective power electronics unit, such that a product of the current yield and the cell voltage of the respective PV cell assigned to the respective power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 4. The PV device of claim 1, further comprising a sensor device, the sensor device comprising: a first sensor configured to determine temperatures of the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell, determine an ambient temperature of the multi-PV cell group, or a combination thereof, wherein one or more parameters describing the temperatures, the ambient temperature, or the temperatures and the ambient temperature are fed to the controller as a first input variable, a second input variable, or the first input variable and the second input variable, respectively; a second sensor configured to determine a light intensity incident on the PV device, wherein a parameter describing the light intensity is fed to the controller as a third input variable; a sensor configured to determine a spectrum of a light incident on the PV device, wherein a parameter describing the spectrum is fed to the controller as a fourth input variable; or any combination thereof, wherein the controller is further configured to control the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit based on the first input variable, the second input variable, the third input variable, the fourth input variable or any combination thereof fed thereto.
 5. The PV device of claim 4, wherein the controller is further configured to perform the control, such that, depending on the first input variable, the second input variable, the third input variable, the fourth input variable, or the respective combination thereof for each power electronics unit of the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit, an input resistance is determined and set such that a product of the current yield and the cell voltage of the PV cell assigned to the respective power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 6. The PV device of claim 1, wherein the first cell type and the second cell type are selected such that a PCE maxima of the first cell type and a PCE maxima of the second cell type lie in different spectral ranges.
 7. The PV device of claim 1, wherein the one first PV cell is a perovskite-based PV cell, the one second PV cell is a silicon-based PV cell, or a combination thereof.
 8. The PV device of claim 7, wherein the controller is further configured to control the respective power electronics unit assigned to the perovskite-based PV cell such that hysteresis of output variables of the first PV cell is compensated.
 9. The PV device of claim 1, wherein the controller is further configured to execute the control of the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit such that aging of a respective PV cell, soiling of the multi-PV cell group, or a combination thereof is compensated.
 10. A method for operating a photovoltaic (PV) device, the PV device including a multi-PV cell group, the multi-PV cell group including at least one first PV cell of a first cell type and one second PV cell of a second cell type, wherein the first cell type and the second cell type differ from one another, and wherein each PV cell of the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell provides an electric cell voltage under light incidence on the respective PV cell, the PV device further including power electronics, the power electronics including a separate first power electronics unit that is assigned to the one first PV cell and a separate second power electronics unit that is assigned to the one second PV cell, wherein an electric cell voltage generated in the respective PV cell and a corresponding current yield are fed to a separate power electronics unit of the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell, the PV device further including a controller for controlling the power electronics, the method comprising: operating, by the controller, the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit independently of one another, such that each PV subsystem, each of which has a respective PV cell of the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell and the separate power electronics unit assigned to the respective PV cell, operates at an optimum operating point of the receptive PV subsystem.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein during the operating of the separate power electronics unit of each PV subsystem, the respective separate power electronics unit is controlled, such that a product of a current yield and a cell voltage of the PV cell assigned to the respective separate power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising: controlling the respective separate power electronics unit; and adjusting an input resistance of the respective separate power electronics unit during the controlling of the respective separate power electronics unit, such that the product of the current yield and the cell voltage of the PV cell assigned to the respective separate power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the PV device further comprising a sensor device, the method further comprising: determining, by the sensor device, temperatures of the one first PV cell, the one second PV cell, or the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell, determining, by the sensor device, an ambient temperature of the multi-PV cell group, or determining, by the sensor device, the temperatures of the one first PV cell, the one second PV cell, or the one first PV cell and the one second PV cell and determining, by the sensor device, the ambient temperature of the multi-PV cell group, wherein one or more parameters describing the temperatures, the ambient temperature, or the temperatures and the ambient temperature are fed to the controller as a first input variable, a second input variable, or the first input variable and the second input variable, respectively; determining, by the sensor device, a light intensity incident on the PV device, wherein a parameter describing the light intensity is fed to the controller as a third input variable; and determining a spectrum of a light incident on the PV device, wherein a parameter describing the spectrum is fed to the controller as a fourth input variable; or any combination thereof, wherein the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit are controlled based on the first input variable, the second input variable, the third input variable, the fourth input variable, or any combination thereof fed to the controller.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the control is executed, such that, depending on the first variable, the second variable, the third variable, the fourth variable, or the respective combination thereof, for each power electronics unit of the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit, that input resistance is determined and set such that the product of the current yield and the cell voltage of the PV cell assigned to the respective power electronics unit is at a maximum.
 15. The method of claim 10, wherein the separate first power electronics unit and the separate second power electronics unit are controlled such that influences caused by aging of a respective PV cell, influences caused by soiling of the multi-PV cell group, or the influences caused by aging of the respective PV cell and the influences caused by soiling of the multi-PV cell group are compensated.
 16. The PV device of claim 5, wherein the controller is configured to perform the control based on lookup tables or in a model-based manner.
 17. The method of claim 14, wherein the control is executed based on lookup tables or in a model-based manner. 